Thu Jun 4, 2009 12:26pm EDT

By Simon Shuster - Analysis

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian Sberbank’s, having acquired a 35 percent stake in Opel, is likely to pass it on to Russian Technologies, a sprawling and secretive industrial giant led by a close ally of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

This would be in line with a familiar Russian strategy of folding scattered assets — in this case, stakes in various automotive groups — into a tightly controlled state behemoth.

Analysts said that Opel would then feed modern European technology to the existing Russian car makers and give them access to western markets, but it would still be an uphill battle to boost operating efficiencies.

Sberbank agreed to acquire the stake last week in a deal to save Opel from the bankruptcy of its U.S. owner General Motors. The deal also gave Canada’s Magna 20 percent of Opel and left GM with 35 percent.

Russia’s business logic in the deal has remained a mystery, and investors in Sberbank have been fretting over how this stake would be managed by the Russian side, and in whose interests.

But on Thursday, the head of Sberbank, German Gref, said his bank would pass its 35 percent stake in Germany’s Opel to a Russian strategic investor, though he did not name any candidates.

“The more likely strategy will be to transfer it to Russian Technologies,” said Dmitry Dmitriev, analyst at VTB bank.

Headed by Putin’s old friend Sergei Chemezov, Russian Technologies has been handed control of more than 400 firms, including key assets in the weapons industry, machine building, aviation and car production.

In its scope and influence, some analysts say it rivals the powerful oligarch groups who cobbled together vast resource empires during privatization.

Last week, two days before the Opel deal, Chemezov said that a decision had already been made to create a special holding for the automotive sector within his conglomerate.

Asked by the Vedomosti daily if it would take over assets held by state-run banks like Sberbank, he said, “We reached an agreement: if (the banks) end up with assets that would be part of our core operations, we can take them under our control.”